... 47. In
accordance with Directive 86/609/EEC, it is necessary to replace, reduce or refine
testing on
vertebrate animals.
Implementation of this
Regulation should be based on the use of alternative
test methods, suitable for the
assessment of
health and
environmental hazards of
chemicals, wherever possible. The use of
animals should be avoided by
recourse to alternative
methods validated by the
Commission or
international bodies, or recognised by the
Commission or the
Agency as appropriate to
meet the
information requirements under this
Regulation. To this end, the
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, should
propose to
amend the
future Commission Regulation on
test methods or this
Regulation, where appropriate, to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing. The
Commission and the
Agency should ensure that
reduction of
animal testing is a key
consideration in the
development and
maintenance of
guidance for
stakeholders and in the
Agency's own
procedures. ...
ARTICLE-9: Exemption from the general obligation to register for product and process orientated research and development (PPORD) [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-37: Downstream user chemical safety assessments and duty to identify, apply and recommend risk reduction measures [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-61: Review of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
ARTICLE-62: Applications for authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-111: Formats and software for submission of information to the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-119: Electronic public access [
go to this ARTICLE]