ARTICLE-28: Duty to pre-register for phase-in substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-61: Review of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
ARTICLE-87: Rapporteurs of Committees and use of experts [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-110: Relations with relevant Community bodies [
go to this ARTICLE]