 |
Law-ref.org | THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES (2) |
Site search
Sister sites
deci [Global Index]
... If the Inquiry Convention has not determined what languages are to be employed, the question shall be decided by the Commission. ...
... The sittings of the Commission are not public, nor the Minutes and documents connected with the inquiry published except in virtue of a decision of the Commission taken with the consent of the parties. ...
... When the Contracting Powers wish to have recourse to the Permanent Court for the settlement of a difference which has arisen between them, the Arbitrators called upon to form the Tribunal with jurisdiction to decide this difference must be chosen from the general list of Members of the Court. ...
... It decides all questions of administration which may arise with regard to the operations of the Court. ...
... At meetings duly summoned the presence of nine members is sufficient to render valid the discussions of the Council. The decisions are taken by a majority of votes. ...
... If the question as to what languages are to be used has not been settled by the 'Compromis', it shall be decided by the Tribunal. ...
... The time fixed by the 'Compromis' may be extended by mutual agreement by the parties, or by the Tribunal when the latter considers it necessary for the purpose of reaching a just decision. ...
... The discussions are under the control of the President. They are only public if it be so decided by the Tribunal, with the assent of the parties. ...
... They are entitled to raise objections and points. The decisions of the Tribunal on these points are final and cannot form the subject of any subsequent discussion. ...
... The Tribunal is entitled to issue rules of procedure for the conduct of the case, to decide the forms, order, and time in which each party must conclude its arguments, and to arrange all the formalities required for dealing with the evidence. ...
... Proceedings for revision can only be instituted by a decision of the Tribunal expressly recording the existence of the new fact, recognizing in it the character described in the preceding paragraph, and declaring the demand admissible on this ground. ...